It’s back to school time. As a parent of two high-school
students, I consider myself fortunate that my kids are not particularly into
bling – they’re not too keen on brand name shoes or apparel; they don’t want a
G-shock watch, they don’t care much for iPhones or any other type of jewelry.
As a marketing professor, I’m concerned that they’re missing out on the whole
bling thing.
High schools are traditional hotbeds of bling. Teenagers
packed tight in a competitive social environment, hormones raging, figuring out
social hierarchies and consciously developing networks and cliques for the
first time, quickly learn to cling to bling as a social marker that
differentiates one group from another, raises an individual above others, and marks
affiliations.
[Of course, bling is hardly limited to teenagers. High schools are merely
training grounds for social behavior that endures a lifetime.]
Parents and teachers react to teenage bling like it's a bad thing. Is it?
Isn’t bling just a language through which peers communicate?
What does bling communicate? It says here is who I am, these
are the groups that I belong to, it cries out: “looking for similar people or
people impressed with this type of bling,” it communicates identity, group
affiliation, and norms. These are fundamental needs for teenagers. Every piece
of bling carries a message.
No wonder high schools are bling-saturated environments.
If it weren’t for bling, high schools would either be very
bland places or teenagers would find other outlets for expressing themselves.
In educational establishments where school uniforms are mandatory, in part to
do away with apparel as markers of differentiation, kids find other ways of
expressing themselves such as hair styles, bags and backpacks, and gadgets (sometimes,
even calculators serve to signal status).
So if bling is essential to teenage (and, by extension, social) communication, are my kids
missing out on sending signals?
Somehow, I don’t think so. In a blingy
environment, going blingless sends a very clear-cut message: “I’m so cool, I’m above
bling.”
But that still leaves me concerned.
No comments:
Post a Comment